New: The State of Indie Launches: June 2026. Who adopts a piece of infrastructure tells you how new it is. Read

← Back to browse

Loyalink

Replace paper loyalty cards with a digital one your customers actually keep. Customers check in with a QR scan, no app required.

Marketing
South Africa Estimated origin: South Africa

Added July 6, 2026 · Last analysed July 6, 2026 · via · 67% unique tagline

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 6 July 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Loyalink is missing several launch fundamentals. Visible gaps: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no robots.txt or sitemap.

Launched on Product Hunt on July 6, 2026. The site is hosted on Railway. Our crawler found 8 technologies on this site, covering transactional email, CSS frameworks, DNS providers, and web fonts. The stack includes Tailwind CSS, Amazon SES, and Google Domains DNS.

It's also on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 244 launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 60 · Many AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (8) · Indie stack

Infrastructure
DNS Google Domains DNS
Hosting Railway
Email
Transactional email Amazon SES
Resend
Build & Framework
CSS framework Tailwind CSS (3)
Font Google Fonts
Package CDN unpkg
UI library Lucide Icons (3)

Email Security

SPF Not published. Your domain can be spoofed in phishing emails.
DKIM Detected via known email provider
DMARC p=none None (p=none). Monitoring only.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (0)

This site uses no client-side storage we could detect on page load.

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
Page title is 67 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 60 characters of the title in search results; aim for 50–60 to keep the whole thing visible.
Meta description is 207 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 155–160 characters of the description in desktop search results (less on mobile); anything past that won't appear.

Performance How?

445 ms Server response
41% Faster than peers
848 ms Largest contentful paint
0.01 Cumulative layout shift
3.0 MB Page weight
2.0 MB Image weight
5 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

2 images: 2 oversized, 2 without width/height

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI copy signals +5
AI onboarding signals +5
AI palette signals +5
AI writing signals +5
AI code-structure signals +5
AI typography signals +15

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
? Privacy Policy not detected
? Terms of Service not detected
Detection works best on English language sites.

Security Headers (0/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

2 JS files
1 CSS files
5 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.