← Back to browse

Single Access Memory

Single Access Memory — Write a thought. Someone will read it. Then it's gone forever.

single-access-memory.onrender.com · Added June 11, 2026 · Last analysed June 11, 2026 · via Hacker News · 77% unique tagline

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 11 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Single Access Memory is missing several launch fundamentals. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no robots.txt or sitemap.

Launched on Hacker News on June 11, 2026. The site is hosted on Render in the United States. Our crawler found 6 technologies on this site, covering CDN, web fonts, frameworks, and hosting. The stack includes Express, Cloudflare, and Google Fonts.

Notably, it's one of 71 launches on this exact stack.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 13 ยท Few AI signals
Informational pattern-match signal. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (6)

Infrastructure
CDN Cloudflare
Hosting Render
Protocol HTTP/3
Build & Framework
Font Google Fonts
Framework Express
Package CDN jsDelivr

Infrastructure

Network
AS397273 · US
DNSSEC
Enabled
DNSKEY records published. DNS responses signed.
SSL Certificate
Google Trust Services
Valid 26 May 2026 to 24 Aug 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.

Email Security

SPF Not published. Your domain can be spoofed in phishing emails.
?
DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.
DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (0)

This site uses no client-side storage we could detect on page load.

Readiness Breakdown How?

โœ“ Custom title and meta description
โœ“ Responsive viewport meta tag
โœ“ Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
- Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
- Canonical URL declared
- Twitter card meta tags
- Favicon present

Performance How?

647 ms Server response
25% Faster than peers
1060 ms Largest contentful paint
0.01 Cumulative layout shift
569 KB Page weight
3 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI palette signals +5
AI writing signals +3
AI code-structure signals +5

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
? Privacy Policy not detected
? Terms of Service not detected
Detection works best on English language sites.

Security Headers (0/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

HTML minified
CSS minified
JS minified
3 JS files
2 CSS files
3 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.