← Back to browse

Prioboard

Prioboard is a prioritisation tool for teams that plan in Linear. Pull initiatives, projects and issues into boards, score them async with frameworks like RICE, reveal results with divergence analysis, and publish the ranking back to Linear.

prioboard.app · Added June 16, 2026 · Last analysed June 16, 2026 · via · 80% unique tagline

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 16 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Prioboard is largely in shape, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and clean crawl signals. What needs work: missing several security headers, tracking cookies set before any opt-in, and no email security records.

Launched on Product Hunt on June 16, 2026. The site is hosted on Amazon.com in the United States, with a domain registered 4 days before launch. The crawl picked up 12 technologies on this site, covering security, analytics, auth, and CDN. The stack includes Clerk, Next.js, and React.

For context, it's running the same core stack as 7,716 other launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 35 · Some AI signals
Informational pattern-match signal. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (12) · Indie stack

Infrastructure
CDN Cloudflare
DNS Vercel DNS
Hosting Vercel
Security Cloudflare Bot Management
HSTS
Email
Transactional email Resend
Build & Framework
Auth Clerk (3)
CSS framework Tailwind CSS
Framework React
Meta-framework Next.js (2)
Analytics & Marketing
Analytics PostHog (3)
Business Tools
Error tracking Sentry

Infrastructure

Network
AS16509 · US
DNS
Vercel DNS
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 11 Jun 2026 to 9 Sep 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
5 days
Registered Jun 2026 · Name.com, Inc.

Email Security

SPF Not published. Your domain can be spoofed in phishing emails.
DKIM Detected via known email provider
DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (11)

Cookies (6)
NameLifetimeDetected as
ph_phc_zJpZpkFBJetwSFZvrqFnsBrKrKZR2mAyyEsuRCUXYtaU_posthog 12mo PostHog
_cfuvid session Cloudflare
__cf_bm < 1h Cloudflare
__client 1y Clerk
__client_uat 1y Clerk
__client_uat_-ms24QQr 1y Clerk
Local storage (2)
KeySizeDetected as
ph_phc_zJpZpkFBJetwSFZvrqFnsBrKrKZR2mAyyEsuRCUXYtaU_posthog 1.3 KB PostHog
__clerk_environment 6.2 KB Clerk
Session storage (3)
KeySizeDetected as
ph_phc_zJpZpkFBJetwSFZvrqFnsBrKrKZR2mAyyEsuRCUXYtaU_posthog 296 B PostHog
ph_phc_zJpZpkFBJetwSFZvrqFnsBrKrKZR2mAyyEsuRCUXYtaU_primary_window_exists 4 B PostHog
ph_phc_zJpZpkFBJetwSFZvrqFnsBrKrKZR2mAyyEsuRCUXYtaU_window_id 38 B PostHog

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
Meta description is 241 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 155–160 characters of the description in desktop search results (less on mobile); anything past that won't appear.

Performance How?

298 ms Server response
57% Faster than peers
520 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
1.0 MB Page weight
2 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI CSS signals +10
AI copy signals +5
AI onboarding signals +5
AI palette signals +5
AI stack signals +10

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

Welcomes AI crawlers
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

sitemap.xml (3 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
? Consent manager not detected
Analytics detected; tracking fires without visitor opt-in.
86% unique

Security Headers (1/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

Code splitting
38 JS files
2 CSS files
2 Third-party domains
Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.