WhatsApp.com
Canal • 2 seguidores • 📉 BENVENUTO NEL CANALE DEL RISPARMIO ESTREMO! 🚨 🏆 Qui trovi ogni giorno una selezione manuale dei migliori affari su Amazon Italia. La nostra missione è farti pagare il meno possibile! In qualità di Affiliato Amazon, ricevo un guadagno dagli acquisti idonei.
Added April 10, 2026
· Last analysed April 10, 2026 · via 
· 60% unique tagline
StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 10 April 2026; the live site may have changed since.
WhatsApp.com scores highly overall, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and well-configured email security. Main gaps: no Referrer-Policy.
Launched on Product Hunt on April 10, 2026. The site is hosted on Facebook in the United States, with a domain registered in 2008. The crawl picked up 12 technologies on this site, covering social embeds, DNS providers, business email, and email security. The stack includes Adobe Identity Provider, Dropbox, and Facebook.
For context, it's more locked down than the typical Product Hunt launch.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (12)
| DNS | WhatsApp DNS |
| Protocol | HTTP/3 (2) |
| Security | HSTS (2) |
| Storage |
Dropbox
|
| Business email |
Google Workspace
|
| Email security | Proofpoint Email Protection |
| Marketing |
Facebook Domain Verification
|
| SEO |
Google Search Console
|
| Social |
Facebook
(4)
|
Instagram
|
|
WhatsApp
|
| Identity | Adobe Identity Provider |
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (1)
| Name | Lifetime | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| wa_csrf | 7d | - |
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| Unfilled template placeholders | +10 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.