Rainz Weather
Get accurate AI-powered weather forecasts with Rainz Weather. Hyper-local predictions, pollen tracking, severe weather alerts, 10-day forecasts, and gamified weather predictions. Free weather app for everyone.
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 17 April 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
Rainz Weather scores highly overall, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and clean crawl signals. Visible gaps: missing several security headers and incomplete email security.
Launched on Product Hunt on April 17, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel, with a domain registered 3 months before launch. Our crawler found 15 technologies on this site, covering weather, AI builders, analytics, and CSS frameworks. The stack includes Tailwind CSS, Amplitude, and Google Fonts.
It's also on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 3,326 launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (15)
| DNS |
|
| Hosting |
|
| Security | HSTS (2) |
| Email forwarding |
|
| CSS framework |
|
| Data API | Tomorrow.io |
| Developer tools |
|
| Font |
|
| UI library |
|
| Analytics |
|
| SEO |
|
| AI builder |
|
| Directory |
|
| Weather |
|
| WeatherAPI.com |
Infrastructure
Email Security
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI CSS signals | +10 |
| AI palette signals | +5 |
| AI writing signals | +5 |
| Recognised AI builder signature | +100 |
| Implausible social-proof claim | +15 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.
