← Back to browse

Qrexio

Validate your SaaS idea in 48h

qrexio.com · Added June 11, 2026 · Last analysed June 11, 2026 · via · 50% unique tagline

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 11 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Qrexio is missing several launch fundamentals. Main gaps: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no robots.txt or sitemap.

Launched on Product Hunt on June 11, 2026. The site is hosted on Hostinger International Limited in the United Kingdom, with a domain registered 6 months before launch. Our crawler found 5 technologies on this site, covering web fonts, hosting, protocol, and seo. The stack includes Google Fonts, Google Search Console, and Hostinger.

Notably, it's on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 490 launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 100 · Strong AI signals
Informational pattern-match signal. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (5)

Infrastructure
Hosting Hostinger (2)
Protocol HTTP/3
Server LiteSpeed Web Server
Build & Framework
Font Google Fonts
Analytics & Marketing
SEO Google Search Console

Infrastructure

DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 26 May 2026 to 24 Aug 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
6 months
Registered Nov 2025 · HOSTINGER operations, UAB

Email Security

SPF ~all Soft-fail (~all). Common and accepted.
?
DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.
DMARC p=none None (p=none). Monitoring only.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (0)

This site uses no client-side storage we could detect on page load.

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description (partial) missing meta description
Responsive viewport meta tag
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
- Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
- Canonical URL declared
- Twitter card meta tags
- Favicon present

Performance How?

144 ms Server response
82% Faster than peers
404 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
213 KB Page weight
1 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI copy signals +5
AI onboarding signals +5
AI writing signals +3
AI iconography signals +3
AI code-structure signals +5
Recognised AI builder signature +30
AI layout signals +5
AI CSS signals +15

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
? Privacy Policy not detected
? Terms of Service not detected
Detection works best on English language sites.

Security Headers (1/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

HTML minified
CSS minified
JS minified
0 JS files
1 CSS files
1 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.