← Back to browse

BuildBid Planets

Submit your agency or startup product, place a bid, and climb the leaderboard.

Added August 27, 2026 · Last analysed August 27, 2026 · via

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 27 August 2026; the live site may have changed since.

BuildBid Planets covers some of the launch checklist, with clean crawl signals. Main gaps: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no email security records.

Launched on Product Hunt on August 27, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel, with a domain registered 5 days before launch. Our crawler found 9 technologies on this site, covering analytics, CSS frameworks, DNS providers, and frameworks. The stack includes Next.js, React, and Tailwind CSS.

It's also on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 14,274 launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 0 · No AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (9)

Infrastructure
DNS Vercel DNS
Hosting Vercel
Security HSTS
Build & Framework
CSS framework Tailwind CSS
Framework React
JavaScript library Three.js
Meta-framework Next.js (5)
UI library Lucide Icons
Analytics & Marketing
Analytics Datafast (3)

Infrastructure

Network
AS16509 · US
DNS
Vercel DNS
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 22 Aug 2026 to 20 Nov 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
5 days
Registered Aug 2026 · HOSTINGER operations, UAB

Email Security

SPF Not published. Your domain can be spoofed in phishing emails.
?
DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.
DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description) (partial) missing og:image
Twitter card meta tags
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
- Canonical URL declared
- Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)

Performance How?

867 ms Server response
13% Faster than peers
568 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
5.7 MB Page weight
5.1 MB Image weight
1 Third-party domains
1 Console errors
0 Failed requests

1 images: 1 oversized, 1 without width/height

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml (3 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
? Privacy Policy not detected
? Terms of Service not detected
? Analytics present, but it set no tracking cookies on our visit (it may be opt-in-gated).
Detection works best on English language sites.

Security Headers (1/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

Code splitting
13 JS files
1 CSS files
1 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.