Snapshots: Aug 11 launch 9.5 Jul 26 discovery

← Back to browse

FeedBoard

Collect product feedback, let users vote on what matters, and share a public roadmap and changelog. A Canny/UserJot alternative with anonymous feedback on the free plan.

Added July 26, 2026 · Last analysed August 11, 2026 · via StackScope Discovery · also on Product Hunt

StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 11 August 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.

FeedBoard ships with the launch fundamentals in place, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and clean crawl signals. Worth fixing first: no Content-Security-Policy and incomplete email security.

The site is hosted on Hostinger International Limited in Lithuania, with a domain registered 3 days before launch. Our crawler found 11 technologies on this site, covering analytics, CSS frameworks, directory, and DNS providers. The stack includes Next.js, React, and Tailwind CSS.

It's also running the same core stack as 5,872 other launches and tighter on security headers than most StackScope Discovery launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

9.5
StackScope Score
Excellent
100/100 Launch Readiness
Launch ready
3/3 Legal
Complete
2/2 Crawl files
Complete
Vibe Score 40 · Some AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (11)

Infrastructure
DNS Cloudflare DNS new
Protocol HTTP/3
Security HSTS
Email
Business email Spaceship Mail (2)
Build & Framework
CSS framework Tailwind CSS
Framework React
Meta-framework Next.js (4)
UI library shadcn/ui
Analytics & Marketing
Analytics Umami new
SEO Google Search Console new
Other
Directory Aura++ new

Infrastructure

DNS
Spaceship DNS
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Green hosted
Host runs on renewable energy. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 26 Jul 2026 to 24 Oct 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
1 month
Registered Jul 2026 · Spaceship, Inc.

Email Security

SPF ~all Soft-fail (~all). Common and accepted.
?
DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.
DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (0)

This site uses no client-side storage we could detect on page load.

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
Meta description is 202 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 155–160 characters of the description in desktop search results (less on mobile); anything past that won't appear.

Performance How?

494 ms Server response
33% Faster than peers
552 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
589 KB Page weight
47 KB Image weight
4 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI CSS signals +10
AI copy signals +5
AI onboarding signals +5
AI palette signals +5
AI writing signals +5
AI stack signals +10

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml (8 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/legal/privacy
Terms of Service
/legal/terms
? Analytics present, but it set no tracking cookies on our visit (it may be opt-in-gated).
92% unique

Security Headers (5/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

Code splitting
17 JS files
2 CSS files
4 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.