← Back to browse

Bitgrain

Upload a photo, pick a style, export as PNG or SVG. Dithering, ASCII, grain, glitch, and more.

Design
India Estimated origin: India

Added May 1, 2026 · Last analysed May 1, 2026 · via

StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 1 May 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.

Bitgrain looks production-ready overall, with fast page loads and clean crawl signals. Main gaps: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and tracking cookies set before any opt-in.

Launched on Product Hunt on May 1, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel, with a domain registered in 2024. We've detected 8 technologies on this site, covering analytics, CSS frameworks, developer tools, and web fonts. The stack includes Tailwind CSS, Cal.com, and Google Fonts.

It's on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 3,371 launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

6.0
StackScope Score
Good
76/100 Launch Readiness
Well prepared
2/3 Legal
Partial
2/2 Crawl files
Complete
Vibe Score 20 · Few AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (8)

Infrastructure
Hosting Vercel (3)
Security HSTS (2)
Build & Framework
CSS framework Tailwind CSS
Developer tools Vite
Font Google Fonts
Analytics & Marketing
Analytics PostHog (4)
Commerce & Payments
Payments Razorpay (5)
Business Tools
Scheduling Cal.com

Infrastructure

Network
AS16509 · US
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 31 Mar 2026 to 29 Jun 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
2.4 years
Registered Apr 2024 · GoDaddy

Email Security

SPF ~all (via apex diptanshumahish.in) Soft-fail (~all). Common and accepted.
?
DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.
DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (17)

Cookies (2)
NameLifetimeDetected as
ph_phc_mSaunToUSBxqJaaLH2kymeBYGQihAMqkVjdiDYWtxBFz_posthog 12mo PostHog
rzp_unified_session_id < 1h Razorpay
Local storage (10)
KeySizeDetected as
bg_sid 12 B -
bitgrain_local_credits 85 B -
bitgrain_user_id 11 B -
imgi_banner_dismissed_product-hunt-may-1st 5 B -
imgi_banner_version 20 B -
imgi_banner_view_count_product-hunt-may-1st 1 B -
imgi_changelog_v1 4 B -
ph_phc_mSaunToUSBxqJaaLH2kymeBYGQihAMqkVjdiDYWtxBFz_posthog 1.8 KB PostHog
rzp_checkout_anon_id 32 B Razorpay
rzp_device_id 65 B Razorpay
Session storage (4)
KeySizeDetected as
ph_phc_mSaunToUSBxqJaaLH2kymeBYGQihAMqkVjdiDYWtxBFz_posthog 388 B PostHog
ph_phc_mSaunToUSBxqJaaLH2kymeBYGQihAMqkVjdiDYWtxBFz_primary_window_exists 4 B PostHog
ph_phc_mSaunToUSBxqJaaLH2kymeBYGQihAMqkVjdiDYWtxBFz_window_id 38 B PostHog
__rzp_risk 2.2 KB Razorpay
IndexedDB (1)
DatabaseVersionDetected as
imgi-db 1 -

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Twitter card meta tags
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
- Canonical URL declared
- Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI palette signals +5
AI typography signals +15

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

Welcomes AI crawlers
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml (48 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
? Privacy Policy not detected
Terms of Service
/blog/floyd-steinberg-dithering-explained-python-photoshop-online-tools--346e89a7-6d15-808d-aa32-d1269503d7ec
? Consent manager not detected
Analytics set tracking cookies on our visit, with no opt-in step.

Security Headers (1/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Performance

79ms response time
Faster than 94% of sites
8 third-party domains loaded

Build

Code splitting
9 JS files
3 CSS files
8 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.