CVSite
Create a professional CV in minutes with Claude AI. ATS optimized, beautiful templates, PDF export — free to start.
Added June 2, 2026
· Last analysed June 2, 2026 · via 
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 2 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
CVSite is largely in shape, with a thorough launch checklist and clean crawl signals. Main gaps: no Content-Security-Policy, incomplete legal pages, and no email security records.
Launched on Product Hunt on June 2, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel. The crawl picked up 6 technologies on this site, covering CSS frameworks, frameworks, hosting, and meta-frameworks. The stack includes Next.js, React, and Tailwind CSS.
For context, it's on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 15,031 launches and more locked down than the typical Product Hunt launch.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (6)
| CSS framework |
Tailwind CSS
|
| Framework |
React
|
| Meta-framework |
Next.js
(2)
|
| SEO |
Google Search Console
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (0)
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI copy signals | +5 |
| AI onboarding signals | +5 |
| AI palette signals | +5 |
| AI writing signals | +5 |
| AI stack signals | +10 |
| AI layout signals | +5 |
| Default scaffold favicon | +10 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.