New: The State of Indie Launches: July 2026. The framework layer is the same everywhere. The payment layer is not. Read

← Back to browse

AIbridge

Compare AI models, hand off tasks and automate workflows

AI

Added August 4, 2026 · Last analysed August 4, 2026 · via

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 4 August 2026; the live site may have changed since.

AIbridge still has work before launch. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no robots.txt or sitemap.

Launched on Product Hunt on August 4, 2026. The site is hosted on Railway, with a domain registered 7 weeks before launch. The crawl picked up 7 technologies on this site, covering APIs, DNS providers, business email, and email forwarding. The stack includes BuySellStartups, Google APIs, and Google Fonts.

For context, it's running the same core stack as 567 other launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 85 · Strong AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (7)

Infrastructure
DNS Namecheap DNS
Hosting Railway
Email
Business email PrivateEmail
Email forwarding Namecheap Email Forwarding (2)
Build & Framework
API Google APIs
Font Google Fonts
Commerce & Payments
Marketplace BuySellStartups

Infrastructure

Network
AS400940 · US
DNS
Namecheap DNS
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Enabled
DNSKEY records published. DNS responses signed.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 15 Jun 2026 to 13 Sep 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
1 month
Registered Jun 2026 · NameCheap, Inc.

Email Security

SPF ~all Soft-fail (~all). Common and accepted.
?
DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.
DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (1)

Local storage (1)
KeySizeDetected as
aib-lang 2 B -

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description (partial) missing meta description
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
- Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
- Canonical URL declared
- Twitter card meta tags

Performance How?

493 ms Server response
35% Faster than peers
596 ms Largest contentful paint
0.02 Cumulative layout shift
568 KB Page weight
1 KB Image weight
2 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI copy signals +5
AI writing signals +5
AI code-structure signals +5
Recognised AI builder signature +30
AI typography signals +15
AI layout signals +5

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/privacy
? Terms of Service not detected
96% unique

Security Headers (0/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

1 JS files
1 CSS files
2 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.