BiasLens. Who rejected you, AI or human?

The bias was always human. We just gave it a name.

Added May 30, 2026 · Last analysed May 30, 2026 · via

Own this Launch?

Screenshot of BiasLens. Who rejected you, AI or human?

StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 30 May 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.

BiasLens. Who rejected you, AI or human? is missing several launch fundamentals. What needs work: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no robots.txt or sitemap.

Launched on Product Hunt on May 30, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel. Our crawler found 3 technologies on this site, covering web fonts, hosting, and security. The stack includes Google Fonts, HSTS, and Vercel.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

1.3

StackScope Score

Poor

29/100 Launch Readiness

Needs work

1/6 Security Headers

Poor

0/3 Legal

Missing

0/2 Crawl files

Missing

Vibe Score 0 · No AI signals

How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (3)

Infrastructure

Hosting	Vercel
Security	HSTS

Build & Framework

Font	Google Fonts

Infrastructure

Network

AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US

AS16509 · US

DNSSEC

Not enabled

DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.

Green hosting

Not green hosted

No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.

SSL Certificate

Google Trust Services

Valid 28 Apr 2026 to 27 Jul 2026

Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.

Email Security

✗

SPF Not published. Your domain can be spoofed in phishing emails.

DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.

✗

DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.

MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.

TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (0)

This site uses no client-side storage we could detect on page load.

Readiness Breakdown How?

⚠

Custom title and meta description (partial) missing meta description

✓ Responsive viewport meta tag

- Open Graph tags (title, image, description)

- Canonical URL declared

- Twitter card meta tags

- Favicon present

- Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)

AI Stance

No AI stance declared

✗ llms.txt published

✓ No AI bots blocked in robots.txt

Content-Signal

? No directive declared

Link headers

? None advertised

Well-Known Files

✗ robots.txt

✗ sitemap.xml

✗ security.txt

✗ llms.txt

✗ ads.txt

✗ humans.txt

Legal

? Privacy Policy not detected

? Terms of Service not detected

Detection works best on English language sites.

Security Headers (1/6)

✗

Referrer-Policy

✗

X-Frame-Options

✗

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)

✗

X-Content-Type-Options

✗

Content-Security-Policy

✓

Strict-Transport-Security

–

X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Performance

454ms response time

Faster than 33% of sites

1 third-party domains loaded

Build

0 JS files

1 CSS files

1 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.