I benchmarked Gemma 4 E2B
After last month's Gemma 4 E4B benchmark, the obvious follow-up: can the 2B variant deliver real generational improvement at constant parameter count? It can. Multi-turn doubled. RAG grounding jumped 17 points. The E2B scored 80.4% overall — 0.4 points behind a model with twice its parameters.
StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 14 April 2026; the live site may have changed since.
I benchmarked Gemma 4 E2B is partway there, with a thorough launch checklist, fast page loads, and clean crawl signals. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and incomplete email security.
Launched on Hacker News on April 13, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel, with a domain registered 1 day before launch. The crawl picked up 7 technologies on this site, covering DNS providers, transactional email, frameworks, and hosting. The stack includes Next.js, React, and Google Search Console.
For context, it's running the same core stack as 2,295 other launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (7) · Indie stack
| DNS |
|
| Hosting |
|
| Security | HSTS (2) |
| Transactional email |
|
| SEO |
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI writing signals | +5 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.