Slicksearchhq
Slick is a modern search engine built for speed, privacy, and relevant results.
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 21 May 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
Slicksearchhq looks production-ready overall, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and clean crawl signals. What needs work: missing several security headers and incomplete email security.
Launched on Hacker News on May 21, 2026. The site is hosted on Bell Canada in Canada, with a domain registered 8 months before launch. We've detected 10 technologies on this site, covering web fonts, backend framework, developer tools, and DNS providers. The stack includes Cloudflare DNS, Express, and Font Awesome.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (10)
| DNS |
Cloudflare DNS
|
| OS |
Ubuntu
|
| Server |
nginx
|
| Transactional email |
Mailjet
(2)
|
| Developer tools |
Vite
|
| Font |
Font Awesome Pro
|
Google Fonts
|
|
| Icon font |
Font Awesome
|
| SEO |
Google Search Console
|
| Backend framework |
Express
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (1)
| Key | Size | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| slick_welcome_seen | 1 B | - |
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI code-structure signals | +5 |
| AI scaffolding signals | +8 |
| Recognised AI builder signature | +30 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.