ScholarXIV Papers API
AI powered research paper explorer
www.scholarxiv.com
· Added June 16, 2026
· Last analysed June 16, 2026 · via 
· 64% unique tagline
StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 16 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.
ScholarXIV Papers API is partway there, with a thorough launch checklist and clean crawl signals. Visible gaps: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and incomplete email security.
Launched on Product Hunt on June 16, 2026. The site is hosted on Amazon.com in the United States, with a domain registered in 2024. The crawl picked up 6 technologies on this site, covering CSS frameworks, DNS providers, email forwarding, and hosting. The stack includes SvelteKit, Tailwind CSS, and HSTS.
For context, it's one of 40 launches on this exact stack.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (6)
| DNS |
Porkbun DNS
(2)
|
| Hosting |
Vercel
(2)
|
| Security | HSTS |
| Email forwarding |
Porkbun Email Forwarding
|
| CSS framework |
Tailwind CSS
|
| Meta-framework |
SvelteKit
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (3)
| Name | Lifetime | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| __vdpl | session | Vercel |
| Key | Size | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| mode-watcher-mode | 5 B | - |
| mode-watcher-theme | 5 B | - |
Readiness Breakdown How?
Performance How?
⚠ 6 images: 5 oversized, 6 without width/height, 3 missing alt text
Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI copy signals | +5 |
| AI onboarding signals | +5 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.