← Back to browse

GameSearch: Game Library

Discover games, track your backlog

Games
Russia Estimated origin: Russia

Added June 23, 2026 · Last analysed June 23, 2026 · via

StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 23 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.

GameSearch: Game Library is missing several launch fundamentals. Main gaps: no Permissions-Policy, incomplete legal pages, and no robots.txt or sitemap.

Launched on Product Hunt on June 23, 2026. The site is hosted on CLODO CLOUD SERVICE CO. L.L.C in the United Arab Emirates. Our crawler found 3 technologies on this site, covering web fonts, security, and servers. The stack includes Google Fonts, HSTS, and nginx.

It's also more locked down than the typical Product Hunt launch.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

3.9
StackScope Score
Poor
52/100 Launch Readiness
Partially ready
0/3 Legal
Missing
0/2 Crawl files
Missing
Vibe Score 10 · Few AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (3)

Infrastructure
Security HSTS
Server nginx
Build & Framework
Font Google Fonts

Infrastructure

DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 23 Jun 2026 to 21 Sep 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.

Email Security

SPF Not published. Your domain can be spoofed in phishing emails.
?
DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.
DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (2)

Cookies (2)
NameLifetimeDetected as
gs_session 6d -
gs_session.sig 6d -

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description (partial) missing meta description
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
- Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
- Canonical URL declared
- Twitter card meta tags

Performance How?

189 ms Server response
69% Faster than peers
528 ms Largest contentful paint
0.04 Cumulative layout shift
690 KB Page weight
488 KB Image weight
2 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

7 images: 2 oversized, 2 missing alt text

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI palette signals +5
AI writing signals +5

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
? Privacy Policy not detected
? Terms of Service not detected
Detection works best on English language sites.

Security Headers (5/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

1 JS files
2 CSS files
2 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.