Retainer
An application built with Google AI Studio.
Added August 29, 2026
· Last analysed August 29, 2026 · via 
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 29 August 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
Retainer is missing several launch fundamentals. Visible gaps: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no robots.txt or sitemap.
Launched on Product Hunt on August 29, 2026. The site is hosted on Google Cloud, with a domain registered in 2023. Our crawler found 5 technologies on this site, covering backend framework, CSS frameworks, developer tools, and hosting. The stack includes Tailwind CSS, Express, and Google Cloud.
It's also on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 794 launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (5)
| Hosting |
Google Cloud
|
| CSS framework |
Tailwind CSS
|
| Developer tools |
Vite
|
| UI library |
Lucide Icons
|
| Backend framework |
Express
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (1)
| Name | Lifetime | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| GAESA | 29d | - |
Readiness Breakdown How?
Performance How?
Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI copy signals | +5 |
| AI palette signals | +5 |
| Recognised AI builder signature | +30 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.