Tavie.work
Tạo CV đẹp, chuyên nghiệp hoàn toàn miễn phí. Chọn mẫu, điền thông tin, tải về PDF ngay lập tức.
Added May 19, 2026
· Last analysed May 19, 2026 · via 
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 19 May 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
Tavie.work is largely in shape, with clean crawl signals. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no email security records.
Launched on Product Hunt on May 19, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel, with a domain registered 1 day before launch. The crawl picked up 7 technologies on this site, covering CSS frameworks, DNS providers, frameworks, and hosting. The stack includes Next.js, React, and Tailwind CSS.
For context, it's running the same core stack as 14,963 other launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (7)
| DNS |
Cloudflare DNS
|
| Hosting |
Vercel
|
| Security | HSTS |
| CSS framework |
Tailwind CSS
|
| Framework |
React
|
| Meta-framework |
Next.js
(3)
|
| SEO |
Google Search Console
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (1)
| Name | Lifetime | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| NEXT_LOCALE | session | Next.js |
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI onboarding signals | +5 |
| AI palette signals | +5 |
| AI writing signals | +5 |
| AI stack signals | +10 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.