← Back to browse

Regente

Regente coordinates Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini on one repo, with manual/MCP fallback for other agent CLIs — it gives cooperating agents a lane and blocks claim collisions before merge. Local-first, cross-tool, pre-merge.

regente.dev · Added June 16, 2026 · Last analysed June 16, 2026 · via · 71% unique tagline

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 16 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Regente is partway there, with complete legal pages and a thorough launch checklist. Visible gaps: missing several security headers, no robots.txt or sitemap, and incomplete email security.

Launched on Product Hunt on June 16, 2026. The site is hosted on Amazon.com in the United States, with a domain registered 1 week before launch. The crawl picked up 6 technologies on this site, covering DNS providers, business email, web fonts, and hosting. The stack includes Google Fonts, Google Search Console, and Google Workspace.

For context, it's on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 1,383 launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 45 · Some AI signals
Informational pattern-match signal. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (6)

Infrastructure
DNS Vercel DNS
Hosting Vercel
Security HSTS
Email
Business email Google Workspace (3)
Build & Framework
Font Google Fonts
Analytics & Marketing
SEO Google Search Console

Infrastructure

Network
AS16509 · US
DNS
Vercel DNS
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 6 Jun 2026 to 4 Sep 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
10 days
Registered Jun 2026 · Name.com, Inc.

Email Security

SPF ~all Soft-fail (~all). Common and accepted.
DKIM Detected via known email provider
DMARC p=none None (p=none). Monitoring only.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (0)

This site uses no client-side storage we could detect on page load.

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
Meta description is 224 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 155–160 characters of the description in desktop search results (less on mobile); anything past that won't appear.

Performance How?

825 ms Server response
16% Faster than peers
504 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
1.1 MB Page weight
435 KB Image weight
3 Third-party domains
1 Console errors
1 Failed requests

5 images: 3 oversized

Broken first-party requests (1), worth fixing
  • 404 /_vercel/insights/script.js

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI onboarding signals +5
AI writing signals +5
AI code-structure signals +20
AI typography signals +15

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
94% unique

Security Headers (1/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

1 JS files
2 CSS files
3 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.