Rayqua RAE
Kein Chatbot. Rayqua RAE automatisiert eingehende Anfragen mit Produktwissen, qualifiziert nach BANT+MEDDIC in mehrstufiger Konversation und bucht Meetings. System-agnostisch. DSGVO-konform. | Not a chatbot. Rayqua RAE automates inbound inquiries with product knowledge, qualifies by BANT+MEDDIC thro...
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 11 May 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
Rayqua RAE looks production-ready overall, with a thorough launch checklist and clean crawl signals. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no email security records.
Launched on Product Hunt on May 11, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel. We've detected 6 technologies on this site, covering DNS providers, business email, web fonts, and hosting. The stack includes Google Fonts, Google Search Console, and Google Workspace.
It's running the same core stack as 4,255 other launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (6)
| DNS |
|
| Hosting |
|
| Security | HSTS |
| Business email |
|
| Font |
|
| SEO |
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (0)
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI onboarding signals | +5 |
| AI iconography signals | +5 |
| AI code-structure signals | +20 |
| Recognised AI builder signature | +30 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.
