Clume
Send and store sensitive files with zero-knowledge encryption. Private. Secure. Verifiable.
Added April 24, 2026
· Last analysed April 24, 2026 · via 
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 24 April 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
Clume looks production-ready overall, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and clean crawl signals. What needs work: missing several security headers and incomplete email security.
Launched on Product Hunt on April 24, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel, with a domain registered 5 months before launch. We've detected 9 technologies on this site, covering baas, CSS frameworks, DNS providers, and transactional email. The stack includes Next.js, React, and Tailwind CSS.
It's running the same core stack as 15,004 other launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (9) · Indie stack
| DNS |
Vercel DNS
|
| Hosting |
Vercel
(2)
|
| Security | HSTS (2) |
| Transactional email |
Firebase Trigger Email
|
| BaaS |
Firebase
(2)
|
| CSS framework |
Tailwind CSS
|
| Framework |
React
|
| Meta-framework |
Next.js
(2)
|
| SEO |
Google Search Console
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (0)
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI copy signals | +5 |
| AI palette signals | +5 |
| AI writing signals | +5 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.