SiteAuditPro
Run automated checks across SEO, LLM readiness, and marketing effectiveness. Get instant scores and recommendations.
Added April 21, 2026
· Last analysed April 21, 2026 · via 
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 21 April 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
SiteAuditPro ships with the launch fundamentals in place, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and well-configured email security. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers.
Launched on Product Hunt on April 21, 2026. The site is hosted on Antagonist. The crawl picked up 6 technologies on this site, covering DNS providers, transactional email, web fonts, and hosting. The stack includes Antagonist, Apache, and Google Fonts.
For context, it's a rare Antagonist sighting, just 4 in our data.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (6)
| DNS | Zoner DNS |
| Hosting |
Antagonist
|
| Server |
Apache
(2)
|
| Transactional email |
Resend
|
| Font |
Google Fonts
|
| SEO |
Google Search Console
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI copy signals | +5 |
| AI onboarding signals | +5 |
| AI writing signals | +5 |
| AI code-structure signals | +5 |
| Round-number metric claim | +5 |
| AI asset signals | +10 |
| AI layout signals | +5 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.