Proofix.ai
Every review on Proofix is verified by a real customer receipt. Fake reviews are impossible. Find honest businesses near you.
Added April 15, 2026
· Last analysed April 15, 2026 · via 
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 15 April 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
Proofix.ai is partway there, with fast page loads. Main gaps: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no sitemap.
Launched on Product Hunt on April 15, 2026. The site is served through Cloudflare, with a domain registered 5 weeks before launch. The crawl picked up 8 technologies on this site, covering package cdn, CDN, DNS providers, and email forwarding. The stack includes cdnjs, Cloudflare, and Cloudflare DNS.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (8)
| CDN |
Cloudflare
(3)
|
| DNS |
Cloudflare DNS
|
| Protocol | HTTP/3 (2) |
| Security | HSTS (2) |
| Email forwarding |
Cloudflare Email Routing
(2)
|
| Transactional email |
Resend
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI palette signals | +5 |
| AI writing signals | +5 |
| AI iconography signals | +5 |
| AI code-structure signals | +5 |
| Recognised AI builder signature | +30 |
| AI layout signals | +5 |
| Unfilled template placeholders | +10 |
| AI CSS signals | +15 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.