Crewhelm — Open-source control plane for AI Agents
The open-source personal control plane for owner-controlled Agents on Cloudflare.
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 10 August 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
Crewhelm — Open-source control plane for AI Agents is partway there, with a thorough launch checklist, well-configured email security, and fast page loads. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers and incomplete legal pages.
The site is served through Cloudflare, with a domain registered 5 days before launch. The crawl picked up 6 technologies on this site, covering CDN, CSS frameworks, DNS providers, and meta-frameworks. The stack includes Astro, Tailwind CSS, and Cloudflare.
For context, it's running the same core stack as 839 other launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (6)
| CDN |
|
| DNS |
|
| Protocol | HTTP/3 |
| CSS framework |
|
| Meta-framework |
|
| SEO |
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (0)
Readiness Breakdown How?
Performance How?
⚠ 3 images: 3 oversized, 1 without width/height, 3 missing alt text
Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| Placeholder branding | +10 |
| AI writing signals | +3 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.