GLM-5.2
Open-weight coding model with a usable 1M token context
Estimated origin: China
Added June 18, 2026
· Last analysed June 18, 2026 · via 
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 18 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
GLM-5.2 ships with the basics, with complete legal pages and clean crawl signals. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers and incomplete email security.
Launched on Product Hunt on June 18, 2026. The site is hosted on Alibaba (US) Technology Co. in Singapore, with a domain registered in 2017. We've detected 7 technologies on this site, covering ai api, collaboration, CSS frameworks, and developer tools. The stack includes Tailwind CSS, Alibaba Cloud, and Feishu / Lark.
It's running the same core stack as 7,721 other launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (7)
| DNS |
Alibaba Cloud
(3)
|
| Business email | Feishu Email |
| CSS framework |
Tailwind CSS
|
| Developer tools |
Vite
|
| SEO |
Google Search Console
|
| Collaboration |
Feishu / Lark
(2)
|
| AI API |
Hugging Face
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (1)
| Name | Lifetime | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| acw_tc | < 1h | Alibaba Cloud |
Readiness Breakdown How?
Performance How?
⚠ 13 images: 10 oversized, 6 without width/height, 7 missing alt text
Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI writing signals | +3 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.