← Back to browse

Profile Unhider

A Chrome extension that surfaces publicly indexed posts and comments for hidden Reddit profiles.

Social

Added August 17, 2026 · Last analysed August 17, 2026 · via

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 17 August 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Profile Unhider is missing several launch fundamentals. Visible gaps: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no robots.txt or sitemap.

Launched on Product Hunt on August 17, 2026. The site is hosted on Netlify. Our crawler found 2 technologies on this site, covering hosting and security. The stack includes HSTS and Netlify.

It's also on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 1,950 launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 51 · Many AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (2)

Infrastructure
Hosting Netlify
Security HSTS

Infrastructure

Network
AS16509 · US
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
DigiCert Inc
Valid 16 Feb 2026 to 19 Mar 2027
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.

Email Security

SPF Not published. Your domain can be spoofed in phishing emails.
?
DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.
DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (0)

This site uses no client-side storage we could detect on page load.

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Responsive viewport meta tag
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
- Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
- Canonical URL declared
- Twitter card meta tags
- Favicon present

Performance How?

418 ms Server response
39% Faster than peers
356 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
5 KB Page weight
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI onboarding signals +5
AI writing signals +3
AI iconography signals +3
AI code-structure signals +5
AI CSS signals +15

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/privacy
? Terms of Service not detected
86% unique

Security Headers (1/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

0 JS files
0 CSS files
0 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.