Eyenima · An atlas for the eye
Educational visual screening and artistic iris photography for iPhone. On-device privacy.
Estimated origin: Italy
Added May 6, 2026
· Last analysed May 6, 2026 · via 
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 6 May 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
Eyenima · An atlas for the eye is largely in shape, with complete legal pages. What needs work: missing Permissions-Policy and Content-Security-Policy, no robots.txt or sitemap, and no email security records.
Launched on Product Hunt on May 6, 2026. The site is hosted on Netlify, with a domain registered in 2007. The crawl picked up 4 technologies on this site, covering web fonts, hosting, mobile, and security. The stack includes Apple App Store, Google Fonts, and HSTS.
For context, it's running the same core stack as 2,205 other launches and tighter on security headers than most Product Hunt launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (4)
| Font |
Google Fonts
|
| Mobile |
Apple App Store
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (1)
| Key | Size | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| eyenima-lang | 2 B | - |
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI writing signals | +5 |
| Recognised AI builder signature | +30 |
| AI typography signals | +15 |
| AI code-structure signals | +5 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.