TouchGrassBar — Codex & Claude Usage in Your Menu Bar
See your Codex and Claude usage limits in your Mac menu bar. Compare your usage on the leaderboard while prompts and provider data stay on your Mac.
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 3 September 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
TouchGrassBar — Codex & Claude Usage in Your Menu Bar is partway there, with a thorough launch checklist and clean crawl signals. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no email security records.
The site is hosted on Vercel, with a domain registered 3 weeks before launch. The crawl picked up 7 technologies on this site, covering ai agent, CSS frameworks, DNS providers, and hosting. The stack includes Astro, Tailwind CSS, and HSTS.
For context, it's running the same core stack as 229 other launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (7)
| DNS |
Vercel DNS
|
| Hosting |
Vercel
|
| Security | HSTS |
| CSS framework |
Tailwind CSS
|
| Meta-framework |
Astro
|
| UI library |
shadcn/ui
|
| AI agent | WebMCP new |
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (0)
Readiness Breakdown How?
Performance How?
⚠ 15 images: 11 oversized, 15 without width/height, 15 missing alt text
Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI onboarding signals | +5 |
| AI writing signals | +3 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.