Kuta
23 treadmill workouts including 12-3-30, HIIT and Norwegian Method. Visual speed cues, voice coaching. Free forever.
Added June 5, 2026
· Last analysed June 5, 2026 · via 
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 5 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
Kuta looks production-ready overall, with a thorough launch checklist, fast page loads, and clean crawl signals. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and incomplete email security.
Launched on Product Hunt on June 5, 2026. The site is hosted on Inleed - Yelles AB in Sweden, with a domain registered 4 months before launch. We've detected 6 technologies on this site, covering analytics, business email, web fonts, and mobile. The stack includes Apple App Store, Google Fonts, and Inleed.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (6)
| Server |
nginx
|
| Business email |
Inleed Email
|
| Font |
Google Fonts
|
| Mobile |
Apple App Store
|
| Site builder |
Inleed
(2)
|
| Analytics |
Umami
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (0)
Readiness Breakdown How?
Performance How?
⚠ 5 images: 4 oversized, 5 missing alt text
Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI palette signals | +5 |
| AI writing signals | +3 |
| AI code-structure signals | +20 |
| AI scaffolding signals | +8 |
| AI typography signals | +5 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.