We're live on Product Hunt. If you have found StackScope useful, a comment would mean a lot. See the launch

← Back to browse

Practix

Upload your lecture slides and Practix builds a timed practice exam or a 10-minute mini quiz, then grades it with a partial-credit rubric. Free, and your coursework never leaves your browser.

Education

Added September 1, 2026 · Last analysed September 1, 2026 · via

StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 1 September 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.

Practix ships with the launch fundamentals in place, with complete legal pages, a complete set of security headers, and a thorough launch checklist. What needs work: incomplete email security.

Launched on Product Hunt on September 1, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel, with a domain registered 12 weeks before launch. The crawl picked up 12 technologies on this site, covering ai api, ui library, CSS frameworks, and web fonts. The stack includes Next.js, React, and Tailwind CSS.

For context, it's running the same core stack as 14,710 other launches and tighter on security headers than most Product Hunt launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

10.0
StackScope Score
Excellent
100/100 Launch Readiness
Launch ready
3/3 Legal
Complete
2/2 Crawl files
Complete
Vibe Score 20 · Few AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (12)

Infrastructure
Hosting Vercel
Security HSTS
Build & Framework
CSS framework Tailwind CSS
Font Google Fonts
Framework React
Meta-framework Next.js (4)
UI library Lucide Icons
shadcn/ui

Infrastructure

Network
AS16509 · US
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 31 Aug 2026 to 29 Nov 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
2 months
Registered Jun 2026 · Spaceship, Inc.

Email Security

SPF Not published. Your domain can be spoofed in phishing emails.
DKIM (via apex studio4any.com) Detected on apex studio4any.com
DMARC p=none (via apex studio4any.com) None (p=none). Monitoring only.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (1)

Local storage (1)
KeySizeDetected as
practix.entitlement.v1 56 B -

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
Page title is 66 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 60 characters of the title in search results; aim for 50–60 to keep the whole thing visible.
Meta description is 191 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 155–160 characters of the description in desktop search results (less on mobile); anything past that won't appear.

Performance How?

1942 ms Server response
3% Faster than peers
976 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
327 KB Page weight
3 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI palette signals +5
AI writing signals +5
AI stack signals +10

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

Welcomes AI crawlers
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml (3 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/privacy
Terms of Service
/terms
94% unique

Security Headers (6/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

Code splitting
7 JS files
3 CSS files
3 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.