求职精灵Genielink
求职精灵是有见求职旗下 AI 求职平台，提供 AI 简历优化、AI 模拟面试、岗位查询、职业规划与求职资料，帮助大学生与应届生提升校招求职效率。
Estimated origin: China
Added April 8, 2026
· Last analysed April 10, 2026 · via 
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 10 April 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
求职精灵Genielink is partway there, with a thorough launch checklist and clean crawl signals. Main gaps: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and incomplete email security.
Launched on Product Hunt on April 8, 2026. The site is hosted on Hangzhou Alibaba Advertising Co. in China, with a domain registered in 2020. The crawl picked up 10 technologies on this site, covering analytics, collaboration, CSS frameworks, and DNS providers. The stack includes Nuxt, Tailwind CSS, and Vue.js.
For context, it's on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 290 launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (10)
| DNS |
Alibaba Cloud
|
| Server |
nginx
(2)
|
| Business email | Feishu Email |
| CSS framework |
Tailwind CSS
|
| Framework |
Vue.js
|
| Meta-framework |
Nuxt
(3)
|
| Analytics |
Baidu Tongji
(2)
|
| SEO |
Baidu Webmaster Tools
|
| Social | WeChat JS-SDK |
| Collaboration |
Feishu / Lark
(2)
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI palette signals | +5 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.