FoodSafety HQ
Food safety software for Australian hospitality, temperature monitoring, cleaning records, allergen management and council-ready audits, aligned with FSANZ.
Estimated origin: Australia
StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 16 August 2026; the live site may have changed since.
FoodSafety HQ ships with the launch fundamentals in place, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and clean crawl signals. Worth fixing first: missing Permissions-Policy and Content-Security-Policy and incomplete email security.
Launched on PeerPush on August 16, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel. The crawl picked up 12 technologies on this site, covering seo, ui library, CSS frameworks, and developer tools. The stack includes Tailwind CSS, Geo Meta Tags, and Google Fonts.
For context, it's running the same core stack as 2,957 other launches and tighter on security headers than most PeerPush launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (12) · Indie stack
| DNS |
Nameserver.net.au DNS
|
| Hosting |
Vercel
|
| Security | HSTS |
| Business email |
Google Workspace
(2)
|
| Transactional email |
Resend
|
| CSS framework |
Tailwind CSS
|
| Developer tools |
Vite
|
| Font |
Google Fonts
|
| UI library |
Lucide Icons
|
shadcn/ui
|
| SEO | Geo Meta Tags |
Google Search Console
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (0)
Readiness Breakdown How?
Performance How?
⚠ 5 images: 4 oversized, 4 without width/height
Broken first-party requests (1), worth fixing
- 401 /api/auth/user
Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI CSS signals | +10 |
| AI copy signals | +5 |
| AI layout signals | +5 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.