adaad

Free tool for product designers and PMs to create animated metric visuals. Build once, embed anywhere — Framer, Webflow, or any site that accepts HTML.

adaadlab.vercel.app · Added June 5, 2026 · Last analysed June 5, 2026 · via PeerPush · 83% unique tagline

Own this Launch?

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 5 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.

adaad ships with the basics, with a thorough launch checklist, fast page loads, and clean crawl signals. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and analytics without a consent banner.

Launched on PeerPush on June 5, 2026. The site is hosted on Amazon.com in the United States. We've detected 6 technologies on this site, covering analytics, build tooling, CSS frameworks, and web fonts. The stack includes Tailwind CSS, Vite, and Google Fonts.

It's running the same core stack as 1,364 other launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

5.5

StackScope Score

Fair

100/100 Launch Readiness

Launch ready

1/6 Security Headers

Poor

0/3 Legal

Missing

2/2 Web Standards

Complete

100/100 Performance

Fast

Vibe Score 25 · Some AI signals

Informational pattern-match signal. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (6)

Infrastructure

Hosting	Vercel
Security	HSTS

Build & Framework

Build tool	Vite
CSS framework	Tailwind CSS
Font	Google Fonts

Analytics & Marketing

Analytics	PostHog

Infrastructure

Network

AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US

AS16509 · US

DNSSEC

Not enabled

DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.

SSL Certificate

Google Trust Services

Valid 28 Apr 2026 to 27 Jul 2026

Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.

Email Security

✗

SPF Not published. Your domain can be spoofed in phishing emails.

DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.

✗

DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.

MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.

TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (5)

Cookies (1)

Name	Lifetime	Detected as
ph_phc_AafoCHjuzVEjEU4qA6AmpTzemmSmA54HXacm3k3dRL8A_posthog	1y	PostHog

Local storage (1)

Key	Size	Detected as
ph_phc_AafoCHjuzVEjEU4qA6AmpTzemmSmA54HXacm3k3dRL8A_posthog	1 KB	PostHog

Session storage (3)

Key	Size	Detected as
ph_phc_AafoCHjuzVEjEU4qA6AmpTzemmSmA54HXacm3k3dRL8A_posthog	90 B	PostHog
ph_phc_AafoCHjuzVEjEU4qA6AmpTzemmSmA54HXacm3k3dRL8A_primary_window_exists	4 B	PostHog
ph_phc_AafoCHjuzVEjEU4qA6AmpTzemmSmA54HXacm3k3dRL8A_window_id	38 B	PostHog

Readiness Breakdown How?

✓ Custom title and meta description

✓ Open Graph tags (title, image, description)

✓ Twitter card meta tags

✓ Canonical URL declared

✓ Responsive viewport meta tag

✓ Favicon present

✓ Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)

⚠

Page title is 65 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 60 characters of the title in search results; aim for 50–60 to keep the whole thing visible.

⚠

Meta description is 234 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 155–160 characters of the description in desktop search results (less on mobile); anything past that won't appear.

Performance How?

150 ms Server response

80% Faster than peers

304 ms Largest contentful paint

0.02 Cumulative layout shift

681 KB Page weight

3 KB Image weight

4 Third-party domains

0 Console errors

0 Failed requests

⚠ 3 images: 2 oversized, 3 without width/height

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

Signal	Points
AI onboarding signals	+5
AI writing signals	+5
AI typography signals	+15

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared

✗ llms.txt published

✓ No AI bots blocked in robots.txt

Content-Signal

? No directive declared

Link headers

? None advertised

Well-Known Files

✓ robots.txt

✓ sitemap.xml (1 URLs)

✗ security.txt

✗ llms.txt

✗ ads.txt

✗ humans.txt

Legal

? Privacy Policy not detected

? Terms of Service not detected

? Consent manager not detected

Analytics detected; tracking fires without visitor opt-in.

Detection works best on English language sites.

Security Headers (1/6)

✗

Referrer-Policy

✗

X-Frame-Options

✗

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)

✗

X-Content-Type-Options

✗

Content-Security-Policy

✓

Strict-Transport-Security

–

X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

✓ HTML minified

✗ CSS minified

✗ JS minified

✓ Code splitting

5 JS files

2 CSS files

4 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.