New: The State of Indie Launches: May 2026. What 17,652 indie launch pages run on once you strip Vercel out. Read

← Back to browse

Aurilix

Aurilix monitors podcast episodes, scores them against your interests, and emails concise summaries, key quotes, and relevance notes.

aurilix.com · Added June 4, 2026 · Last analysed June 4, 2026 · via PeerPush · 71% unique tagline

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 4 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Aurilix is missing several launch fundamentals. Visible gaps: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no robots.txt or sitemap.

Launched on PeerPush on June 4, 2026. The site is hosted on Google LLC in the United States, with a domain registered 9 months before launch. Our crawler found 7 technologies on this site, covering affiliate, CSS frameworks, DNS providers, and business email. The stack includes htmx, Tailwind CSS, and Google Cloud.

Notably, it's one of only 44 launches we've crawled running htmx.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 10 · Few AI signals
Informational pattern-match signal. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (7)

Infrastructure
DNS Google Domains DNS
Hosting Google Cloud
Email
Business email Google Workspace
Build & Framework
CSS framework Tailwind CSS
Framework htmx
Analytics & Marketing
Affiliate Rewardful
SEO Google Search Console

Infrastructure

Network
AS15169 · US
DNS
Google Domains DNS
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
SSL Certificate
Google Trust Services
Valid 19 May 2026 to 17 Aug 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
9 months
Registered Aug 2025 · eNom, LLC

Email Security

SPF ~all Soft-fail (~all). Common and accepted.
?
DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.
DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (5)

Cookies (4)
NameLifetimeDetected as
landing 3mo -
phsid < 1h -
referer 3mo -
vid 1y -
Session storage (1)
KeySizeDetected as
htmx-current-path-for-history 1 B htmx

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
- Twitter card meta tags

Performance How?

62 ms Server response
98% Faster than peers
336 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
223 KB Page weight
51 KB Image weight
3 Third-party domains

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI copy signals +5
AI palette signals +5

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
? Privacy Policy not detected
? Terms of Service not detected
Detection works best on English language sites.

Security Headers (1/6)

Referrer-Policy via <meta name="referrer">
Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

HTML minified
CSS minified
JS minified
3 JS files
1 CSS files
3 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.