Xagio on new websites

SEO plugin for WordPress offering on-page optimization and rank tracking.

Sites using Xagio
451
since Jul 2026
Last 30 days
0.0%
of new sites, to Oct 16
-0.0 pts on the 30 days before
Last 7 days
0.0%
of new sites, 7-day average
-0.0 pts on the week before
Rank in SEO
#14
of 321 tools, all time
Found via
  • StackScope Wider Web 451
First seen Jul 8, 2026
Last seen Oct 17, 2026
Website xagio.com
View

What we found

  1. Xagio appeared on about 120 new sites in the last 30 days.[1]
  2. Almost all new Xagio sites also use jQuery.

Share of new sites using Xagio

0.000% 0.005% 0.010% 0.015% 0.020% Jul Aug Sep Oct [2] [3]

The line is the 7-day average share of new sites that use Xagio, day by day for the last 90 days and weekly before that (left of the dashed line). It starts at our first detection. The shaded areas were measured against a different set of sites, so the line can step there without Xagio itself changing.[2][3]

What Xagio runs on

Who uses Xagio

Kind of site 20 sites with a known type, all time
TypeSitesShareBar
Health 4 20.0%
E-commerce 3 15.0%
Marketing 3 15.0%
Social 3 15.0%
Education 2 10.0%
Finance 2 10.0%
Productivity 2 10.0%
Content 1 5.0%
Country[4] known for 139 of 451 sites (30.8%)
CountrySitesShareBar
United States 138 99.3%
Australia 1 0.7%
Domain ending 444 sites, all time
EndingSitesShareBar
.com 220 49.6%
.net 101 22.8%
.nz 55 12.4%
.org 32 7.2%
.uk 11 2.5%
.au 5 1.1%
.ca 5 1.1%
.in 3 0.7%

SEO on new sites

# Movement Tool Share of all sites Share of category Bar
1 – Google Search Console 18.9% 95.8%
2 ▲1 Bing Webmaster 0.8% 3.8%
3 ▼1 Geo Meta Tags 0.7% 3.8%
4 – Yandex Domain Verification 0.2% 1.1%
5 – Baidu Webmaster Tools 0.1% 0.4%
…
14 – Xagio <0.1% <0.1%

All-time shares across the new sites we track: of all of them, and of the sites using any SEO tool. All 321 in SEO

Often used with Xagio

Tool Sites with both vs all new sites Bar
Elementor Pro 268 31x
Google Maps 272 14x
jQuery 448 7.0x
Google Fonts 395 2.2x

Tools that turn up far more often on Xagio sites than on new sites in general, and how many times as common each one is there.

451 sites across the wider web use Xagio

None of them is a product launch we list individually, so there is nothing to show here. They still count towards the figures above. How StackScope Discovery works

The StackScope API serves all 451 sites using Xagio, filterable and exportable, from £15 a month.

Notes

  1. These figures cover websites that went live since April 2026, not the web as a whole.
  2. Grey: before 8 July 2026, we only tracked launches from launch platforms. From that date we crawl the wider web as well, so the share is measured against a much larger set of sites. For one continuous measure, view launch platforms only.
  3. Amber: 8 July to 10 September 2026, before we improved our infrastructure to index new sites much sooner, often on the day they go live. Sites found that early often haven't finished setting up, so anything usually added after launch reads lower from 10 September. We record each site as it was when we found it.
  4. Country comes from what each site says about itself, such as a company registration, legal terms or a phone number, not just its domain ending. We count a country only where it is stated plainly enough to be sure: a governing-law clause or company registration number on a legal page, a phone country code, or a country domain ending. Sites that publish none are not counted at all.

How this page is made

StackScope looks at each new website near the day it goes live and records what it was built with. We do not go back later, so these figures describe what sites launch with, not what they run today. A site counts towards Xagio when we detect Xagio on it at that look.

Every share on this page is a proportion of the new sites we were tracking at the time. Sites we found across the wider web count towards the figures, but only product launches are listed by name. How StackScope detects technologies ยท How StackScope Discovery works

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.