Urlixgo
Build branded links, track comprehensive analytics, and optimize your marketing campaigns with our powerful, intuitive platform.
www.urlixgo.me
· Added June 18, 2026
· Last analysed June 18, 2026 · via 
· 20% unique tagline (similar to FbFast)
StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 18 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Urlixgo looks production-ready overall, with complete legal pages and a thorough launch checklist. Visible gaps: missing several security headers, no sitemap, and incomplete email security.
Launched on Product Hunt on June 18, 2026. The site is hosted on Amazon.com in the United States. We've detected 12 technologies on this site, covering advertising, auth, build tooling, and consent tooling. The stack includes Google Funding Choices, Google Sign-In, and Tailwind CSS.
It's on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 1,606 launches.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (12) · Indie stack
| DNS |
Namecheap DNS
|
| Hosting |
Vercel
|
| Security | HSTS |
| Business email |
Namecheap Email Forwarding
(2)
|
| Transactional email |
Resend
|
| Auth |
Google Sign-In
|
| Build tool |
Vite
|
| CSS framework |
Tailwind CSS
|
| Font |
Google Fonts
|
| Advertising |
Google Ads
|
Google AdSense
(2)
|
|
| Consent |
Google Funding Choices
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (2)
| Key | Size | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| google_auto_fc_cmp_setting | 3 B | Google Funding Choices |
| theme | 4 B | - |
Readiness Breakdown How?
Performance How?
⚠ 3 images: 2 oversized, 2 without width/height
Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI palette signals | +5 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.