VendorFox
VendorFox helps IT teams track hardware lifecycle, End of Life notices, firmware updates, and security advisories across multiple vendors in one centralised platform.
Estimated origin: United Kingdom
Added April 14, 2026
· Last analysed April 14, 2026 · via 
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 14 April 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
VendorFox scores highly overall, with a thorough launch checklist, well-configured email security, and clean crawl signals. Visible gaps: missing Permissions-Policy and Content-Security-Policy and incomplete legal pages.
Launched on Product Hunt on April 14, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel, with a domain registered 8 months before launch. The crawl picked up 12 technologies on this site, covering baas, consent tooling, DNS providers, and business email. The stack includes CookieYes, Next.js, and React.
For context, it's on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 3,464 launches and more locked down than the typical Product Hunt launch.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (12) · Indie stack
| DNS |
Cloudflare DNS
|
| Hosting |
Vercel
(2)
|
| Security | HSTS (2) |
| Business email |
Google Workspace
(3)
|
| Email marketing |
HubSpot
|
| Transactional email |
Firebase Trigger Email
|
| Consent |
CookieYes
(3)
|
| SEO |
Google Search Console
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI copy signals | +5 |
| AI writing signals | +5 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.