Ura Persona AI
裏人格AIは、ブラウザの検索履歴と任意で補足したAI会話ログ・SNS下書き・日記から、欲望、不安、才能、思考の癖を読み解くAI性格診断サービスです。
Estimated origin: Japan
Added May 21, 2026
· Last analysed May 21, 2026 · via 
· also on StackScope Discovery
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 21 May 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
Ura Persona AI scores highly overall, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and clean crawl signals. Visible gaps: missing X-Frame-Options and Content-Security-Policy and no email security records.
Launched on Product Hunt on May 21, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel. The crawl picked up 8 technologies on this site, covering advertising, consent tooling, CSS frameworks, and DNS providers. The stack includes Google Funding Choices, Next.js, and React.
For context, it's on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 14,770 launches and more locked down than the typical Product Hunt launch.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (8)
| DNS | Star Domain DNS |
| Hosting |
Vercel
|
| Security | HSTS |
| CSS framework |
Tailwind CSS
|
| Framework |
React
|
| Meta-framework |
Next.js
|
| Advertising |
Google AdSense
(2)
|
| Consent |
Google Funding Choices
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (1)
| Key | Size | Detected as |
|---|---|---|
| google_auto_fc_cmp_setting | 3 B | Google Funding Choices |
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI palette signals | +5 |
| Default scaffold favicon | +10 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.