QR Code Pro
Create trackable short links and downloadable QR codes for free, with built-in scan analytics.
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 8 July 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
QR Code Pro looks production-ready overall, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and clean crawl signals. Worth fixing first: missing several security headers and incomplete email security.
Launched on Product Hunt on July 8, 2026. The site is hosted on DreamHost, with a domain registered 2 weeks before launch. We've detected 9 technologies on this site, covering baas, business email, transactional email, and web fonts. The stack includes Apache, Chart.js, and DreamHost.
It's one of 33 launches on this exact stack.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (9)
| Business email | DreamHost Email |
| Transactional email |
|
| BaaS |
|
| Font |
|
| JavaScript library |
|
| Package CDN |
|
| SEO |
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (0)
Readiness Breakdown How?
Performance How?
Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI copy signals | +5 |
| AI writing signals | +5 |
| AI code-structure signals | +5 |
| Recognised AI builder signature | +30 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.
