← Back to browse

CryptoBreaker

No Guesswork. Only Data.

Crypto
South Korea Estimated origin: South Korea

Added July 22, 2026 · Last analysed July 22, 2026 · via · 50% unique tagline

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 22 July 2026; the live site may have changed since.

CryptoBreaker looks production-ready overall, with complete legal pages and clean crawl signals. What needs work: missing Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, tracking cookies set before any opt-in, and no email security records.

Launched on Product Hunt on July 22, 2026. The site is hosted on SK Broadband Co Ltd in South Korea. We've detected 7 technologies on this site, covering analytics, DNS providers, finance, and os. The stack includes Gabia, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager.

It's tighter on security headers than most Product Hunt launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

7.9
StackScope Score
Good
61/100 Launch Readiness
Well prepared
3/3* Legal
Complete*
2/2 Crawl files
Complete
Vibe Score 40 · Some AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (7)

Infrastructure
DNS Gabia
OS Ubuntu
Server nginx
Build & Framework
Realtime Socket.IO
Analytics & Marketing
Analytics Google Analytics (4)
Tag management Google Tag Manager medium
Commerce & Payments
Finance TradingView

Infrastructure

DNS
Gabia
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 17 Jun 2026 to 15 Sep 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.

Email Security

SPF Not published. Your domain can be spoofed in phishing emails.
?
DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.
DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (15)

Cookies (5)
NameLifetimeDetected as
cbk_lang 1y -
cbk_lang_manual 1y -
cbk_private_session 1mo -
_ga 1y Google Analytics
_ga_WB4LJLSPWX 1y Google Analytics
Local storage (9)
KeySizeDetected as
cbkMiningBg 3 B -
cbk_active_page 4 B -
cbk_anon_client_v52 24 B -
cbk_anon_float_v231 33 B -
cbk_lang 2 B -
cbk_language 2 B -
cbk_market_terminal_active_v16 4 B -
mineSeconds 1 B -
setItem 0 B -
Session storage (1)
KeySizeDetected as
cbk_desktop_cache_reset_34201 1 B -

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description) (partial) missing og:image
Responsive viewport meta tag
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
- Canonical URL declared
- Twitter card meta tags
- Favicon present

Performance How?

2506 ms Server response
2% Faster than peers
5808 ms Largest contentful paint
0.20 Cumulative layout shift
8.2 MB Page weight
4 Third-party domains
10 Console errors
10 Failed requests

12 images: 12 without width/height, 1 missing alt text

Broken first-party requests (10), worth fixing
  • 401 /api/membership/me
  • 404 /pc/assets/backgrounds/sunset.png
  • 404 /pc/assets/backgrounds/event.png
  • 404 /pc/assets/backgrounds/winter.png
  • 404 /pc/assets/backgrounds/rain.png
  • 404 /pc/assets/backgrounds/night.png
  • 404 /pc/assets/backgrounds/day.png
  • 401 /api/alerts/settings

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI palette signals +5
AI writing signals +5
AI iconography signals +5
AI code-structure signals +10
AI CSS signals +15

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml (2 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/privacy?lang=en
Terms of Service
/terms?lang=en
? Consent manager not detected
Analytics set tracking cookies on our visit, with no opt-in step.
94% unique

Security Headers (4/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

Code splitting
13 JS files
5 CSS files
4 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.