Anchor for Hotels
Ava answers hotel calls 24/7, captures booking and group leads, handles FAQs, and routes urgent calls without PMS integration.
Added May 23, 2026
· Last analysed May 23, 2026 · via 
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 23 May 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
Anchor for Hotels scores highly overall, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and well-configured email security. Main gaps: missing Permissions-Policy and Content-Security-Policy.
Launched on Product Hunt on May 23, 2026. The site is hosted on AWS S3 and served through AWS CloudFront, with a domain registered 3 days before launch. The crawl picked up 6 technologies on this site, covering CDN, cloud, DNS providers, and business email. The stack includes Amazon Web Services, AWS CloudFront, and AWS S3.
For context, it's on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 513 launches and more locked down than the typical Product Hunt launch.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (6) · Scale-up stack
| CDN |
AWS CloudFront
|
| Cloud |
Amazon Web Services
|
| DNS |
Porkbun DNS
|
| Hosting |
AWS S3
|
| Security | HSTS |
| Business email |
Google Workspace
(3)
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (0)
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI onboarding signals | +5 |
| AI code-structure signals | +5 |
| AI scaffolding signals | +8 |
| Recognised AI builder signature | +30 |
| AI CSS signals | +15 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.