← Back to browse

DomainDash

Website monitoring for freelancers and small teams. We check your uptime, SSL, DNS, and domain registration as often as every minute and alert you before your customers notice. Start free.

Developer Tools
United Kingdom Estimated origin: United Kingdom

Added June 23, 2026 · Last analysed June 23, 2026 · via Hacker News

StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 23 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.

DomainDash looks production-ready overall, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and clean crawl signals. Main gaps: missing several security headers and incomplete email security.

Launched on Hacker News on June 23, 2026. The site is hosted on AWS S3 and served through AWS CloudFront. We've detected 17 technologies on this site, covering analytics, backend framework, CDN, and chat widgets. The stack includes Tailwind CSS, Vue.js, and Amazon SES.

It's one of just 19 launches we've crawled on this exact stack.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 15 · Few AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (17) · Scale-up stack

Infrastructure
CDN AWS CloudFront
Cloud Amazon Web Services
DNS AWS Route 53
Hosting AWS S3
Protocol HTTP/3
Email
Business email Google Workspace
Email marketing Brevo
Transactional email Amazon SES
Build & Framework
CSS framework Tailwind CSS
Font Google Fonts
Framework Vue.js (2)
JavaScript library VueUse
Static site generator VitePress (2)
Analytics & Marketing
Analytics Plausible
SEO Google Search Console
Business Tools
Chat Chatwoot (4)
Other
Backend framework Laravel

Infrastructure

Network
AS16509 · US
DNS
AWS Route 53
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Amazon
Valid 28 May 2026 to 11 Dec 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.

Email Security

SPF ~all Soft-fail (~all). Common and accepted.
DKIM Detected via known email provider
DMARC p=none None (p=none). Monitoring only.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (4)

Cookies (3)
NameLifetimeDetected as
cw_conversation 1y Chatwoot
domain_dash_session 2h Laravel
XSRF-TOKEN 2h Laravel
Local storage (1)
KeySizeDetected as
vitepress-theme-appearance 4 B -

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
Meta description is 188 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 155–160 characters of the description in desktop search results (less on mobile); anything past that won't appear.

Performance How?

187 ms Server response
69% Faster than peers
836 ms Largest contentful paint
0.04 Cumulative layout shift
1.1 MB Page weight
75 KB Image weight
4 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

3 images: 3 oversized, 3 without width/height

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI onboarding signals +5
AI palette signals +5
AI writing signals +5

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml (17 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/privacy
Terms of Service
/terms
? Analytics present, but it set no tracking cookies on our visit (it may be opt-in-gated).
90% unique

Security Headers (0/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

2 JS files
1 CSS files
4 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.