LavinMQ
The extremely fast Message Broker that handles a large amounts of messages and connections, based on the AMQP 0-9-1 protocol.
Added May 26, 2026
· Last analysed May 26, 2026 · via 
StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 26 May 2026; the live site may have changed since.
Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.
LavinMQ ships with the basics, with a thorough launch checklist and well-configured email security. Visible gaps: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no robots.txt.
Launched on Product Hunt on May 26, 2026. The site is hosted on GitHub Pages and served through AWS CloudFront, with a domain registered in 2021. We've detected 16 technologies on this site, covering CDN, package cdn, analytics, and cloud. The stack includes Alpine.js, Tailwind CSS, and Amazon Web Services.
It's one of just 3 launches we've crawled on this exact stack.
If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →
Tech Stack (16) · Scale-up stack
| CDN |
AWS CloudFront
|
Fastly
|
|
| Cloud |
Amazon Web Services
|
| DNS |
AWS Route 53
|
| Hosting |
GitHub Pages
|
| Business email |
Google Workspace
|
| Email marketing |
Campaign Monitor
(4)
|
| CSS framework |
Tailwind CSS
|
| Framework |
Alpine.js
|
| Package CDN |
jsDelivr
|
unpkg
|
|
| Video |
YouTube
|
| Analytics |
Plausible
(2)
|
| SEO |
Google Search Console
|
| Social |
Bluesky
|
| CRM |
Pipedrive
|
Infrastructure
Email Security
Storage (0)
Readiness Breakdown How?
Vibe Score Breakdown How?
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| AI copy signals | +5 |
This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.