Snapshots: Aug 17 launch 2.0 Aug 17 discovery

← Back to browse

gitprofile.me

Pick a template, autofill from your GitHub, and get a profile README you'd actually ship.

Developer Tools

Added August 17, 2026 · Last analysed August 17, 2026 · via StackScope Discovery · also on Product Hunt

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 17 August 2026; the live site may have changed since.

gitprofile.me is missing several launch fundamentals. Main gaps: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no robots.txt or sitemap.

The site is hosted on Vercel and served through Cloudflare. Our crawler found 13 technologies on this site, covering web fonts, analytics, CDN, and CSS frameworks. The stack includes Next.js, React, and Tailwind CSS.

It's also on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 13,303 launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 20 · Few AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (13)

Infrastructure
CDN Cloudflare
DNS Cloudflare DNS
Hosting Vercel
Security HSTS
Build & Framework
CSS framework Tailwind CSS
Font Google Fonts
OnlineWebFonts
Framework React
Icon font Font Awesome
Meta-framework Next.js (5)
Package CDN cdnjs
UI library Lucide Icons
Analytics & Marketing
Analytics Google Analytics new

Infrastructure

Network
AS16509 · US
DNS
Cloudflare DNS
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 14 Aug 2026 to 12 Nov 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.

Email Security

SPF Not published. Your domain can be spoofed in phishing emails.
?
DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.
DMARC Not published. Receivers fall back to permissive defaults.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (0)

This site uses no client-side storage we could detect on page load.

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
- Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
- Canonical URL declared
- Twitter card meta tags
- Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)

Performance How?

363 ms Server response
44% Faster than peers
892 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
514 KB Page weight
4 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI palette signals +5
AI iconography signals +5
Default scaffold favicon +10

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
? Privacy Policy not detected
? Terms of Service not detected
? Analytics present, but it set no tracking cookies on our visit (it may be opt-in-gated).
Detection works best on English language sites.

Security Headers (1/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

Code splitting
9 JS files
5 CSS files
4 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.