← Back to browse

Plannotator

A local diff viewer for reviewing agent-written code — git, jj, Perforce, and GitHub/GitLab PRs. Annotate lines and files; your notes feed straight back into your agent session. Optional AI layer: inline Q&A, guided reviews, and launchable review agents. Free, MIT / Apache-2.0, runs on your machine.

Developer Tools

Added July 6, 2026 · Last analysed July 6, 2026 · via Hacker News · also on Product Hunt

StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 6 July 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.

Plannotator ships with the basics, with a thorough launch checklist. Main gaps: missing several security headers, incomplete legal pages, and no robots.txt or sitemap.

Launched on Hacker News on July 6, 2026. The site is hosted on AWS S3 and served through AWS CloudFront, with a domain registered 6 months before launch. We've detected 9 technologies on this site, covering CDN, cloud, CSS frameworks, and DNS providers. The stack includes Astro, Tailwind CSS, and Amazon Web Services.

It's one of 47 launches on this exact stack.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 73 · Many AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (9) · Scale-up stack

Infrastructure
CDN AWS CloudFront
Cloud Amazon Web Services
DNS Cloudflare DNS
Hosting AWS S3
Email
Business email Google Workspace (3)
Build & Framework
CSS framework Tailwind CSS
Font Google Fonts
Meta-framework Astro medium
Analytics & Marketing
SEO Google Search Console

Infrastructure

Network
AS16509 · US
DNS
Cloudflare DNS
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Amazon
Valid 28 Dec 2025 to 26 Jan 2027
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
8 months
Registered Dec 2025 · NameCheap, Inc.

Email Security

SPF ~all Soft-fail (~all). Common and accepted.
DKIM Detected via known email provider
DMARC p=none None (p=none). Monitoring only.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (0)

This site uses no client-side storage we could detect on page load.

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
Meta description is 300 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 155–160 characters of the description in desktop search results (less on mobile); anything past that won't appear.

Performance How?

354 ms Server response
43% Faster than peers
284 ms Largest contentful paint
0.01 Cumulative layout shift
5.1 MB Page weight
4.5 MB Image weight
4 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

194 images: 46 oversized, 12 without width/height, 3 missing alt text

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI CSS signals +15
AI onboarding signals +5
AI palette signals +5
AI writing signals +5
AI code-structure signals +10
AI scaffolding signals +8
AI typography signals +15

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/privacy/
? Terms of Service not detected
76% unique

Security Headers (0/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

0 JS files
3 CSS files
4 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.