← Back to browse

CorDx Tyfast Flu A+B Rapid Antigen Test

This launch may no longer be active. Its site did not respond when we last checked on August 29, 2026.

CorDx Tyfast SARS-CoV-2/Flu A+B Rapid Antigen Point-of-Care Test is a lateral flow immunoassay intended for in vitro rapid, simultaneous qualitative detection and differentiation of nucleocapsid antigen from SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and influenza B directly from anterior nasal swab specimens obtained...

Health
United States Estimated origin: United States

Added April 4, 2026 · Last analysed April 10, 2026 · via

StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 10 April 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.

CorDx Tyfast Flu A+B Rapid Antigen Test has the basics covered well, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and clean crawl signals. Visible gaps: missing several security headers, tracking cookies set before any opt-in, and incomplete email security.

Launched on Product Hunt on April 4, 2026. The site is hosted on Hostinger and served through Cloudflare, with a domain registered in 2021. Our crawler found 15 technologies on this site, covering analytics, servers, CDN, and CMS. The stack includes Osclass, cdnjs, and Cloudflare.

It's also one of only 7 launches we've crawled running Osclass.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

7.1
StackScope Score
Good
82/100 Launch Readiness
Well prepared
3/3* Legal
Complete*
2/2 Crawl files
Complete
Vibe Score 5 · Few AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (15)

Infrastructure
CDN Cloudflare (4)
DNS Cloudflare DNS
Hosting Hostinger (3)
Protocol HTTP/3 (2)
Server LiteSpeed Web Server (2)
PHP (2)
Email
Business email Hostinger Email
Email marketing Sender
Build & Framework
CMS Osclass (2)
Icon font Font Awesome (2)
Package CDN cdnjs (2)
Analytics & Marketing
Analytics Cloudflare Web Analytics
Google Analytics (2)
StatCounter (2)
SEO Open Graph

Infrastructure

Network
AS13335 · US
DNS
Cloudflare DNS
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Green hosted
Host runs on renewable energy. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
Domain Age
5.1 years
Registered Jul 2021 · GoDaddy.com, LLC

Email Security

SPF ~all Soft-fail (~all). Common and accepted.
?
DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.
DMARC p=none None (p=none). Monitoring only.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (1)

Cookies (1)
NameLifetimeDetected as
oc_master_id 3y Osclass
HTTP cookies only. This snapshot pre-dates 21 Apr 2026 when StackScope started capturing JavaScript-set cookies, localStorage, IndexedDB, and Cache Storage.

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
Meta description is 177 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 155–160 characters of the description in desktop search results (less on mobile); anything past that won't appear.
- Canonical URL declared
- Twitter card meta tags

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI code-structure signals +5

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml (2889 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/privacy-policy
Terms of Service
/terms-conditions
? Consent manager not detected
Analytics set tracking cookies on our visit, with no opt-in step.
88% unique

Security Headers (1/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Performance

1589ms response time
Faster than 5% of sites
9 third-party domains loaded

Build

Code splitting
14 JS files
11 CSS files
9 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.