We're live on Product Hunt. If you have found StackScope useful, a comment would mean a lot. See the launch

← All technologies

Sites using CodeSandbox

Online code editor and sandboxing environment.

#17 of 313 in Developer Tools Tracked since Apr 2026 Last seen: Sep 1, 2026 Website: codesandbox.io
Stackdar alerts

Get told when a new site ships with CodeSandbox.

Stackdar watches every launch we detect and sends you the ones using CodeSandbox, by email, Slack or webhook. On every plan, from £15 a month.

See how alerts work

122 sites

79 found by StackScope, 43 via launch platforms

StackScope Discovery (Indie) 57 StackScope Wider Web 22 Product Hunt 28 Hacker News 14 PeerPush 1
  • StackScope Discovery (Indie) 57
  • StackScope Wider Web 22
  • Product Hunt 28
  • Hacker News 14
  • PeerPush 1
Last 7 days 0.0% -0.0pp
Most used with HSTS, Tailwind CSS, Next.js
Top product types Developer Tools, AI, Productivity
Green hosting 48% vs 45% avg

CodeSandbox has been detected on 122 launches we've crawled. The 7-day rolling share is 0.0%, roughly steady week on week. Most recent detection: 모디(MODY) - 대중이 평가하는 디자인 커뮤니티, today.

It's most commonly paired with HSTS, Tailwind CSS, and Next.js. By product type, the launches using it are most often Developer Tools (47%), AI (16%), and Productivity (8%). By domain ending, launches using it are 6.9 times as likely as the average launch to live on a .dev domain. The 42 scored launches using CodeSandbox average a StackScope score of 7.5 out of 10, against 6.4 across all launches we score.

What kind of products ship with CodeSandbox

85 launches

AI
16.47%
Productivity
8.24%
Hiring & HR
5.88%
Marketing
5.88%
Education
3.53%
Social
3.53%
Crypto
2.35%
Content
1.18%
Design
1.18%
Directory
1.18%
Finance
1.18%
Games
1.18%
Health
1.18%

Domain endings using CodeSandbox

121 sites

  • .com 28.93%
  • .dev 20.66%
  • .ai 10.74%
  • .io 9.92%
  • .app 8.26%
  • .cloud 3.31%
  • .xyz 2.48%
  • .fr 1.65%
  • .in 1.65%
  • .org 1.65%
  • .site 1.65%
  • .tech 1.65%
  • .link 0.83%
  • .md 0.83%

Share of new sites using CodeSandbox

Each dot is one launch day. Line is the 7-day rolling average; weekly averages before June 2026.

0.0%
last 7 days
-0.0pp vs prior week
122
sites all time
since Apr 2026
CodeSandbox daily detection trend Before 8 July 2026: launch platforms only. We began crawling the wider web on this date, so the cohort this share is measured against changes here. 5% 2% 0% Apr May Jun Jul Aug Jul 1, 2026: Adoption figures now count launches from launch platforms. Use the source view to include StackScope Discovery. Weekly averages before this point, daily after. Jun 3 · 0 / 714 = 0.0% Jun 4 · 0 / 599 = 0.0% Jun 5 · 0 / 581 = 0.0% Jun 6 · 0 / 436 = 0.0% Jun 7 · 0 / 404 = 0.0% Jun 8 · 0 / 515 = 0.0% Jun 9 · 0 / 876 = 0.0% Jun 10 · 2 / 722 = 0.3% Jun 11 · 1 / 577 = 0.2% Jun 12 · 0 / 449 = 0.0% Jun 13 · 0 / 380 = 0.0% Jun 14 · 0 / 345 = 0.0% Jun 15 · 2 / 532 = 0.4% Jun 16 · 1 / 1052 = 0.1% Jun 17 · 1 / 907 = 0.1% Jun 18 · 0 / 674 = 0.0% Jun 19 · 1 / 547 = 0.2% Jun 20 · 0 / 443 = 0.0% Jun 21 · 2 / 383 = 0.5% Jun 22 · 0 / 576 = 0.0% Jun 23 · 0 / 900 = 0.0% Jun 24 · 2 / 737 = 0.3% Jun 25 · 0 / 618 = 0.0% Jun 26 · 0 / 534 = 0.0% Jun 27 · 0 / 431 = 0.0% Jun 28 · 0 / 383 = 0.0% Jun 29 · 0 / 503 = 0.0% Jun 30 · 0 / 801 = 0.0% Jul 1 · 0 / 795 = 0.0% Jul 2 · 1 / 604 = 0.2% Jul 3 · 0 / 499 = 0.0% Jul 4 · 0 / 411 = 0.0% Jul 5 · 0 / 367 = 0.0% Jul 6 · 1 / 551 = 0.2% Jul 7 · 0 / 1171 = 0.0% Jul 8 · 1 / 12590 = 0.0% Jul 9 · 2 / 23745 = 0.0% Jul 10 · 2 / 22552 = 0.0% Jul 11 · 1 / 15979 = 0.0% Jul 12 · 3 / 20291 = 0.0% Jul 13 · 0 / 20922 = 0.0% Jul 14 · 3 / 20408 = 0.0% Jul 15 · 2 / 17242 = 0.0% Jul 16 · 2 / 14264 = 0.0% Jul 17 · 1 / 19732 = 0.0% Jul 18 · 0 / 22700 = 0.0% Jul 19 · 3 / 26075 = 0.0% Jul 20 · 2 / 22586 = 0.0% Jul 21 · 2 / 21649 = 0.0% Jul 22 · 1 / 23202 = 0.0% Jul 23 · 1 / 16863 = 0.0% Jul 24 · 1 / 12855 = 0.0% Jul 25 · 0 / 8947 = 0.0% Jul 26 · 1 / 19976 = 0.0% Jul 27 · 1 / 33865 = 0.0% Jul 28 · 2 / 38221 = 0.0% Jul 29 · 3 / 50103 = 0.0% Jul 30 · 3 / 43952 = 0.0% Jul 31 · 1 / 51110 = 0.0% Aug 1 · 4 / 50484 = 0.0% Aug 2 · 2 / 49661 = 0.0% Aug 3 · 2 / 48190 = 0.0% Aug 4 · 0 / 37326 = 0.0% Aug 5 · 2 / 32706 = 0.0% Aug 6 · 2 / 36581 = 0.0% Aug 7 · 2 / 37888 = 0.0% Aug 8 · 0 / 39680 = 0.0% Aug 9 · 4 / 34205 = 0.0% Aug 10 · 0 / 28846 = 0.0% Aug 11 · 0 / 32018 = 0.0% Aug 12 · 2 / 33478 = 0.0% Aug 13 · 2 / 49912 = 0.0% Aug 14 · 0 / 51428 = 0.0% Aug 15 · 2 / 51492 = 0.0% Aug 16 · 4 / 51806 = 0.0% Aug 17 · 0 / 41413 = 0.0% Aug 18 · 0 / 53842 = 0.0% Aug 19 · 1 / 49415 = 0.0% Aug 20 · 2 / 66830 = 0.0% Aug 21 · 6 / 90358 = 0.0% Aug 22 · 2 / 91513 = 0.0% Aug 23 · 2 / 90227 = 0.0% Aug 24 · 6 / 78847 = 0.0% Aug 25 · 1 / 69248 = 0.0% Aug 26 · 2 / 65056 = 0.0% Aug 27 · 2 / 83369 = 0.0% Aug 28 · 0 / 83310 = 0.0% Aug 29 · 2 / 84155 = 0.0% Aug 30 · 2 / 92079 = 0.0% Aug 31 · 0 / 88629 = 0.0%
Mar 30, 2026 90 days Aug 31, 2026

The shaded part of the chart is measured against a different set of sites. Until 8 July 2026 we only tracked launches from launch platforms; from that date we crawl the wider web as well. The share is a proportion of whatever we were tracking at the time, so it can step at that line without the technology itself changing. For a single continuous measure, switch to launch platforms.

How StackScope detects technologies

⋮ Jul 1, 2026: Adoption figures now count launches from launch platforms. Use the source view to include StackScope Discovery.

Developer Tools leaders

Tool % of launches % of category
#1 Vite 22.13% 96.61%
#2 Rspack 0.39% 1.68%
#3 ▲1 pywb (Wayback Machine toolkit) 0.11% 0.49%
#4 ▼1 SheetJS 0.08% 0.33%
#5 Weglot 0.06% 0.25%
#17 ▼7 CodeSandbox Current page <0.01% 0.02%

Percentages show adoption among indie launches: the share of all analysed launches, and of launches using any Developer Tools tool.Among August launches it ranked #22 in Developer Tools, down from #15 in July. All 313 in Developer Tools →

Often used with

Tool Launches
HSTS 41
Tailwind CSS 38
Next.js 35
React 35
Vercel 34

Tools most often detected on the same launches as CodeSandbox.

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.