DokuWiki on new websites

Open source wiki software that stores pages as plain text files without a database.

Sites using DokuWiki
77
since Jul 2026
Last 30 days
0.0%
of new sites, to Oct 18
-0.0 pts on the 30 days before
Last 7 days
0.0%
of new sites, 7-day average
+0.0 pts on the week before
Rank in CMS
#56
of 712 tools, all time
Found via
  • StackScope Wider Web 77
First seen Jul 22, 2026
Last seen Oct 14, 2026
Website dokuwiki.org
View

What we found

  1. DokuWiki appeared on 19 new sites in the last 30 days.[1]
  2. Almost all new DokuWiki sites also use jQuery.

Share of new sites using DokuWiki

0.000% 0.001% 0.002% 0.003% 0.004% Aug Sep Oct [2]

The line is the 7-day average share of new sites that use DokuWiki, over the last 90 days. It starts at our first detection. The shaded area was measured against a different set of sites, so the line can step there without DokuWiki itself changing.[2]

What DokuWiki runs on, and what runs on it

Runs on
Extended by

Percentages are the all-time share of DokuWiki sites that also use each one.

Who uses DokuWiki

Country[3] likely for 13 of 77 sites (16.9%)
CountrySitesShareBar
United Kingdom 3 23.1%
France 2 15.4%
Brazil 1 7.7%
Canada 1 7.7%
Switzerland 1 7.7%
Germany 1 7.7%
India 1 7.7%
Japan 1 7.7%
Russia 1 7.7%
Slovakia 1 7.7%
Domain ending 77 sites, all time
EndingSitesShareBar
.com 42 54.6%
.org 9 11.7%
.net 4 5.2%
.uk 3 3.9%
.ca 2 2.6%
.fr 2 2.6%
.site 2 2.6%
.xyz 2 2.6%
.ai 1 1.3%
.br 1 1.3%
.ch 1 1.3%
.de 1 1.3%

CMS on new sites

# Movement Tool Share of all sites Share of category[4] Bar
1 – WordPress 12.3% 94.2%
2 – Blogger 0.2% 1.4%
3 – Payload 0.1% 0.7%
4 – Odoo 0.1% 0.5%
5 – Joomla 0.1% 0.4%
…
56 ▼10 DokuWiki <0.1% <0.1%

All-time shares across the new sites we track: of all of them, and of the sites using any CMS tool. Among September launches it ranked #57 in CMS, down from #47 in August. All 712 in CMS

Often used with DokuWiki

Tool Sites with both vs all new sites Bar
jQuery UI 31 683x

Tools that turn up far more often on DokuWiki sites than on new sites in general, and how many times as common each one is there.

77 sites across the wider web use DokuWiki

None of them is a product launch we list individually, so there is nothing to show here. They still count towards the figures above. How StackScope Discovery works

The StackScope API serves all 77 sites using DokuWiki, filterable and exportable, from £15 a month.

Notes

  1. These figures cover websites that went live since April 2026, not the web as a whole.
  2. Amber: 8 July to 10 September 2026, before we improved our infrastructure to index new sites much sooner, often on the day they go live. Sites found that early often haven't finished setting up, so anything usually added after launch reads lower from 10 September. We record each site as it was when we found it.
  3. Country comes from what each site says about itself, such as a company registration, legal terms or a phone number, not just its domain ending. Too few sites state their country plainly for the usual count, so this one also counts single signals: a country domain ending, a phone number (for North America, its area code), a location the site declares in its own page metadata, or a country-specific vendor stack and the page language where they agree and nothing contradicts them. Read these as likely rather than certain.
  4. Some products people expect to see here are filed under a related category: Site Builder, Ecommerce.

How this page is made

StackScope looks at each new website near the day it goes live and records what it was built with. We do not go back later, so these figures describe what sites launch with, not what they run today. A site counts towards DokuWiki when we detect DokuWiki on it at that look.

Every share on this page is a proportion of the new sites we were tracking at the time. Sites we found across the wider web count towards the figures, but only product launches are listed by name. How StackScope detects technologies ยท How StackScope Discovery works

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.