← Back to browse

Speaking-club

Join live sessions with real listeners or run self-practice drills on your own. Schedule practice, earn credits by listening, and use recordings plus AI coac...

Education
United States Estimated origin: United States

Added June 9, 2026 · Last analysed June 9, 2026 · via Hacker News

StackScope records what new websites are built with, the week they launch. Most we find ourselves, by watching public internet infrastructure for brand-new sites; the rest come from Product Hunt, Hacker News and PeerPush. We crawled this one for its tech stack and scored it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 9 June 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Every technology below links to its own page: which other new sites launched with it. Vendors and agencies watch those pages with Stackdar and hear about new adopters the week they ship, from £15 a month.

Speaking-club looks production-ready overall, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and clean crawl signals. Visible gaps: missing several security headers, tracking cookies set before any opt-in, and incomplete email security.

Launched on Hacker News on June 9, 2026. The site is hosted on Microsoft Corporation in the United States. We've detected 8 technologies on this site, covering analytics, chat widgets, DNS providers, and business email. The stack includes Next.js, React, and Azure DNS.

It's on one of the most common stacks we track, shared by 1,295 launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 18 · Few AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (8)

Infrastructure
DNS Azure DNS
Email
Business email Microsoft 365 (2)
Build & Framework
Framework React
Meta-framework Next.js (2)
Analytics & Marketing
Analytics Google Analytics (3)
SEO Google Search Console
Tag management Google Tag Manager
Business Tools
Chat Crisp (4)

Infrastructure

DNS
Azure DNS
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
DigiCert Inc
Valid 14 May 2026 to 14 Nov 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.

Email Security

SPF -all Strict (-all). Strong.
?
DKIM Not detected at common selectors. Your provider may use a custom one.
DMARC p=none None (p=none). Monitoring only.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (6)

Cookies (4)
NameLifetimeDetected as
crisp-client%2Fsession%2F86189b66-51f5-494e-b5ac-97968a754bad 6mo Crisp
SC_LOCALE 1y -
_ga 1y Google Analytics
_ga_71V0PVCVR1 1y Google Analytics
Local storage (2)
KeySizeDetected as
crisp-client/session/86189b66-51f5-494e-b5ac-97968a754bad 44 B Crisp
crisp-client/session/86189b66-51f5-494e-b5ac-97968a754bad:e 13 B Crisp

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description)
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
Page title is 69 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 60 characters of the title in search results; aim for 50–60 to keep the whole thing visible.

Performance How?

1247 ms Server response
7% Faster than peers
2700 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
1.5 MB Page weight
985 KB Image weight
4 Third-party domains
0 Console errors
0 Failed requests

56 images: 1 oversized, 4 without width/height, 6 missing alt text

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI onboarding signals +5
AI palette signals +5
AI writing signals +3
AI layout signals +5

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml (15 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/en/privacy/
Terms of Service
/en/terms/
? Consent manager not detected
Analytics set tracking cookies on our visit, with no opt-in step.
96% unique

Security Headers (0/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

Code splitting
8 JS files
2 CSS files
4 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

App Manifest

display: standalone 2 icons
theme #ffffff
Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.