New: The State of Indie Launches: June 2026. Who adopts a piece of infrastructure tells you how new it is. Read

← Back to browse

Recensa

How much do you trust your AI? Recensa is the verification layer for AI-generated and finished documents — an independent check that catches errors and issues a verifiable seal. Word and PDF, before you send, sign, or file.

Developer Tools

Added July 5, 2026 · Last analysed July 5, 2026 · via · 83% unique tagline

StackScope is a free public catalogue of indie launches. We find launches on Product Hunt, Hacker News and similar feeds, then crawl each site to detect its tech stack and score it for launch readiness: DNS, security headers, SEO basics. This page is what we saw on 5 July 2026; the live site may have changed since.

Recensa is largely in shape, with complete legal pages, a thorough launch checklist, and fast page loads. What needs work: missing several security headers, tracking cookies set before any opt-in, and incomplete email security.

Launched on Product Hunt on July 5, 2026. The site is hosted on Vercel, with a domain registered 3 weeks before launch. The crawl picked up 11 technologies on this site, covering analytics, CSS frameworks, DNS providers, and business email. The stack includes Next.js, React, and Tailwind CSS.

For context, it's running the same core stack as 9,369 other launches.

If you own this site, refresh the snapshot and see the full fix list any time →

Vibe Score 30 · Some AI signals
How much the site looks AI-generated. Informational pattern-match signal, not a verdict. Does not feed the StackScope Score. See which fingerprints fired →

Tech Stack (11) · Indie stack

Infrastructure
DNS Namecheap DNS
Hosting Vercel
Security HSTS
Email
Business email PrivateEmail (2)
Transactional email Resend
Build & Framework
CSS framework Tailwind CSS
Framework React
Meta-framework Next.js (5)
Analytics & Marketing
Analytics Google Analytics (5)
SEO Google Search Console
Tag management Google Tag Manager (2)

Infrastructure

Network
AS16509 · US
DNS
Namecheap DNS
Authoritative nameserver
DNSSEC
Not enabled
DNS responses unsigned. Cache-poisoning vulnerable.
Green hosting
Not green hosted
No green-energy record. Data from The Green Web Foundation.
SSL Certificate
Let's Encrypt
Valid 10 Jun 2026 to 8 Sep 2026
Certificate as captured in this snapshot, not a live check.
Domain Age
25 days
Registered Jun 2026 · NameCheap, Inc.

Email Security

SPF ~all Soft-fail (~all). Common and accepted.
DKIM Detected via known email provider
DMARC p=none None (p=none). Monitoring only.
?
MTA-STS Not deployed. Mail to your domain can be downgraded to plaintext en route.
?
TLS-RPT Not configured. You won't hear about silent SMTP TLS handshake failures.

Storage (2)

Cookies (2)
NameLifetimeDetected as
_ga 1y Google Analytics
_ga_PB7CVPTK9P 1y Google Analytics

Readiness Breakdown How?

Custom title and meta description
Open Graph tags (title, image, description) (partial) missing og:image
Twitter card meta tags
Canonical URL declared
Responsive viewport meta tag
Favicon present
Semantic HTML (nav, main, article)
Page title is 69 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 60 characters of the title in search results; aim for 50–60 to keep the whole thing visible.
Meta description is 223 characters (advisory) Google only shows about 155–160 characters of the description in desktop search results (less on mobile); anything past that won't appear.

Performance How?

99 ms Server response
94% Faster than peers
692 ms Largest contentful paint
0.00 Cumulative layout shift
961 KB Page weight
366 KB Image weight
2 Third-party domains
1 Console errors
1 Failed requests
Broken first-party requests (1), worth fixing
  • 401 /api/access/me

Indicative grade from a single automated render, not a substitute for Lighthouse or field data, and not part of the StackScope score.

Vibe Score Breakdown How?

SignalPoints
AI onboarding signals +5
AI palette signals +5
AI writing signals +5
AI stack signals +10
AI layout signals +5

This score is based on structural patterns and is not definitive. Many legitimate sites may trigger signals, and AI-built sites may go undetected. It should be treated as an indicator, not a verdict.

AI Stance

No AI stance declared
llms.txt published
No AI bots blocked in robots.txt
? No directive declared
? None advertised

Well-Known Files

robots.txt
sitemap.xml (68 URLs)
security.txt
llms.txt
ads.txt
humans.txt
Privacy Policy
/privacy
Terms of Service
/terms
? Consent manager not detected
Analytics set tracking cookies on our visit, with no opt-in step.
90% unique

Security Headers (1/6)

Permissions-Policy experimental (check browser support)
X-XSS-Protection deprecated (use Content-Security-Policy)

Build

Code splitting
19 JS files
2 CSS files
2 Third-party domains

Brand Colours

Something not look right? If a technology shown here is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] and we'll review it.